eWorkOrders vs UpKeep CMMS
Comparison Guide for Maintenance Teams (2026)
eWorkOrders and UpKeep are cloud-based CMMS platforms used to manage maintenance operations including work orders, preventive maintenance, asset tracking, inventory control, and related workflows. This comparison summarizes publicly available information on pricing structure, feature availability, implementation approach, mobile functionality, customization options, security posture, and company background to help maintenance teams evaluate the two systems.
UpKeep: per-user subscription pricing model
UpKeep: founded 2014
UpKeep: preventive maintenance available in selected tiers
UpKeep: venture-backed company
eWorkOrders vs UpKeep at a glance
eWorkOrders and UpKeep both provide core CMMS functionality, including work orders, preventive maintenance, asset and inventory tracking, mobile access, and reporting. The main differences are in pricing structure, plan packaging, and how certain features are included across tiers.
Choose eWorkOrders if you prefer flat-fee pricing with unlimited users on Starter and Advanced plans, with Enterprise custom pricing. It is commonly used by multi-site and operations-focused teams that need configurable workflows, GIS-based asset tracking, and long-term maintenance management capabilities.
Choose UpKeep if you prefer a per-user subscription model designed around mobile-first maintenance workflows. Pricing and feature availability vary by plan tier, and some advanced capabilities are included in higher-level packages.
Which CMMS Is Right for You?
Both platforms provide core CMMS capabilities such as work order management, preventive maintenance, asset and inventory tracking, mobile access, and service request handling. Differences may exist in pricing models, feature packaging, customization options, and deployment approach.
Information is based on publicly available sources and vendor documentation and may change over time. Always confirm current details directly with the vendor.
Feature Comparison: eWorkOrders vs UpKeep*
Both platforms provide core CMMS functionality including work orders, preventive maintenance, asset tracking, multi-site management, mobile access, barcode scanning, and reporting.
Differences are primarily in feature availability by plan, implementation approach, configuration options, security posture, and deployment model.
* Feature availability and platform details may change over time. Information should be confirmed directly with each vendor.
eWorkOrders Third-Party Security Ratings (2026)
eWorkOrders publishes its third-party cybersecurity ratings so prospective customers can independently verify our security before purchasing. Both SecurityScorecard and BitSight evaluate cybersecurity based on externally observable data, providing objective assessments that cannot be self-reported.
SecurityScorecard
100% score across all 10 evaluated categories. Zero high-, medium-, or low-risk breach issues identified.
- Network Security
- DNS Health
- Patching Cadence
- Endpoint Security
- IP Reputation
- Application Security
- Cubit Score
- Hacker Chatter
- Information Leak
- Social Engineering
BitSight
BitSight security rating, current as of 2026.
BitSight scores are derived entirely from externally observable data. Companies cannot self-report data into their BitSight rating, making it one of the more rigorous third-party security assessments available to enterprise buyers.
Why this matters: SecurityScorecard and BitSight rate a company’s security from the outside, using data a company cannot fake or fill in itself. That makes the scores an independent way to check how seriously a software provider protects your data before you commit. eWorkOrders publishes these ratings openly so you can see them for yourself.
* Security ratings reflect the data available at the time of review and can change over time. Confirm current ratings directly with SecurityScorecard and BitSight.
Frequently Asked Questions: eWorkOrders vs UpKeep
Can I customize eWorkOrders or UpKeep to match my workflows?
eWorkOrders supports configurable workflows, modules, and forms that can be tailored to match operational requirements. UpKeep focuses on standardized workflows designed for faster setup and ease of use. The key difference is flexibility versus standardization, depending on how much customization your team requires.
Can a CMMS track assets across multiple sites?
Both platforms support multi-site asset tracking. eWorkOrders provides GIS-based mapping and centralized visibility of assets across locations. UpKeep organizes assets through structured location hierarchies and mobile access. The difference is map-based visualization versus list-based organizational structure.
Does eWorkOrders or UpKeep offer a free plan?
Neither platform offers a permanent free plan. eWorkOrders provides a guided demo with a product specialist. UpKeep offers a self-guided trial experience. The difference is structured onboarding support versus independent evaluation. Always confirm current trial and demo options with each vendor.
Is flat-fee or per-user CMMS pricing better for my team?
Per-user pricing increases as additional users are added, while flat-fee pricing remains fixed within a plan tier. The most suitable model depends on team size, growth rate, and budget predictability needs. Smaller teams may benefit from per-user pricing, while larger or growing teams often prefer fixed-cost structures.
Ready to see why maintenance teams choose eWorkOrders over UpKeep?
Schedule a demo to see eWorkOrders CMMS in action, including work orders, preventive maintenance, asset tracking, multi-site management, reporting, and mobile workflows.
Trusted by maintenance teams across manufacturing, government, healthcare, education, and utilities since 1995.
